DISCRETE‐TRIALS SPACED RESPONDING IN THE PIGEON: THE DEPENDENCE OF EFFICIENT PERFORMANCE ON THE AVAILABILITY OF A STIMULUS FOR COLLATERAL PECKING
Identifieur interne : 000E32 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000E31; suivant : 000E33DISCRETE‐TRIALS SPACED RESPONDING IN THE PIGEON: THE DEPENDENCE OF EFFICIENT PERFORMANCE ON THE AVAILABILITY OF A STIMULUS FOR COLLATERAL PECKING
Auteurs : Barry Schwartz ; David R. Williams [États-Unis]Source :
- Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior [ 0022-5002 ] ; 1971-09.
English descriptors
- Teeft :
- Collateral, Collateral behavior, Collateral behaviors, Consummatory behavior, Contingency, Differential reinforcement, Effective collateral behavior, Experimental analysis, Feeder operation, First session, Food magazine, Green light, Individual pigeons, Latency, Latency distributions, Operant, Other half, Pecking, Pigeon, Poor performance, Possible reinforcers, Present experiment, Reinforcement, Reinforcer, Temporal discrimination, Trial duration.
Abstract
Four pigeons were exposed to a discrete‐trial schedule in which only responses spaced by at least 6 sec were reinforced. After 45, fifty‐trial sessions, they failed to meet the spacing requirement in over 90% of the trials. When an alternative, non‐contingent key (pecks on which had no consequence) was illuminated concurrently with the first key, the spacing performance of the three pigeons that pecked the non‐contingent key improved so that they were obtaining 75% of the possible reinforcers. These data demonstrated the importance of collateral behavior in mediating spaced performance. It was suggested that pigeons may successfully refrain from responding on the spacing procedure only when another stimulus correlated with reinforcement is available for pecking, and that the form that collateral behavior takes may, in general, be non‐arbitrary, and species dependent.
Url:
- https://api.istex.fr/document/26B90E42013F1437C134F6DACD1B0E0BF2BB5B2F/fulltext/pdf
- http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1333860
DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1971.16-155
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 000531
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 000530
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 000A92
- to stream Pmc, to step Corpus: 000057
- to stream Pmc, to step Curation: 000057
- to stream Pmc, to step Checkpoint: 000070
- to stream Ncbi, to step Merge: 000028
- to stream Ncbi, to step Curation: 000028
- to stream Ncbi, to step Checkpoint: 000028
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 000E48
- to stream Main, to step Curation: 000E32
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">DISCRETE‐TRIALS SPACED RESPONDING IN THE PIGEON: THE DEPENDENCE OF EFFICIENT PERFORMANCE ON THE AVAILABILITY OF A STIMULUS FOR COLLATERAL PECKING</title><author><name sortKey="Schwartz, Barry" sort="Schwartz, Barry" uniqKey="Schwartz B" first="Barry" last="Schwartz">Barry Schwartz</name></author><author><name sortKey="Williams, David R" sort="Williams, David R" uniqKey="Williams D" first="David R." last="Williams">David R. Williams</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:26B90E42013F1437C134F6DACD1B0E0BF2BB5B2F</idno><date when="1971" year="1971">1971</date><idno type="doi">10.1901/jeab.1971.16-155</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/26B90E42013F1437C134F6DACD1B0E0BF2BB5B2F/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000531</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000531</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000530</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000A92</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000A92</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0022-5002:1971:Schwartz B:discrete:trials:spaced</idno><idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno><idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1333860</idno><idno type="RBID">PMC:1333860</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">000057</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">000057</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Curation">000057</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Curation">000057</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Checkpoint">000070</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000070</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">000028</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">000028</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Checkpoint">000028</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0022-5002:1971:Schwartz B:discrete:trials:spaced</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">000E48</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000E32</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000E32</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">DISCRETE‐TRIALS SPACED RESPONDING IN THE PIGEON: THE DEPENDENCE OF EFFICIENT PERFORMANCE ON THE AVAILABILITY OF A STIMULUS FOR COLLATERAL PECKING<ref type="note" target="#fn1"><hi rend="superscript">1</hi></ref></title><author><name sortKey="Schwartz, Barry" sort="Schwartz, Barry" uniqKey="Schwartz B" first="Barry" last="Schwartz">Barry Schwartz</name><affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="no comma">UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Williams, David R" sort="Williams, David R" uniqKey="Williams D" first="David R." last="Williams">David R. Williams</name><affiliation></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="2"><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><placeName><region type="state">Pennsylvanie</region></placeName><wicri:cityArea>Correspondence address: Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, 3815 Walnut Street, Philadelphia</wicri:cityArea></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR</title><idno type="ISSN">0022-5002</idno><idno type="eISSN">1938-3711</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">16</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="155">155</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="160">160</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">6</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1971-09">1971-09</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0022-5002</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0022-5002</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Collateral</term><term>Collateral behavior</term><term>Collateral behaviors</term><term>Consummatory behavior</term><term>Contingency</term><term>Differential reinforcement</term><term>Effective collateral behavior</term><term>Experimental analysis</term><term>Feeder operation</term><term>First session</term><term>Food magazine</term><term>Green light</term><term>Individual pigeons</term><term>Latency</term><term>Latency distributions</term><term>Operant</term><term>Other half</term><term>Pecking</term><term>Pigeon</term><term>Poor performance</term><term>Possible reinforcers</term><term>Present experiment</term><term>Reinforcement</term><term>Reinforcer</term><term>Temporal discrimination</term><term>Trial duration</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Four pigeons were exposed to a discrete‐trial schedule in which only responses spaced by at least 6 sec were reinforced. After 45, fifty‐trial sessions, they failed to meet the spacing requirement in over 90% of the trials. When an alternative, non‐contingent key (pecks on which had no consequence) was illuminated concurrently with the first key, the spacing performance of the three pigeons that pecked the non‐contingent key improved so that they were obtaining 75% of the possible reinforcers. These data demonstrated the importance of collateral behavior in mediating spaced performance. It was suggested that pigeons may successfully refrain from responding on the spacing procedure only when another stimulus correlated with reinforcement is available for pecking, and that the form that collateral behavior takes may, in general, be non‐arbitrary, and species dependent.</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list><country><li>États-Unis</li></country><region><li>Pennsylvanie</li></region></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Schwartz, Barry" sort="Schwartz, Barry" uniqKey="Schwartz B" first="Barry" last="Schwartz">Barry Schwartz</name></noCountry><country name="États-Unis"><region name="Pennsylvanie"><name sortKey="Williams, David R" sort="Williams, David R" uniqKey="Williams D" first="David R." last="Williams">David R. Williams</name></region></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Psychologie/explor/BernheimV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000E32 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000E32 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Psychologie
|area= BernheimV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:26B90E42013F1437C134F6DACD1B0E0BF2BB5B2F
|texte= DISCRETE‐TRIALS SPACED RESPONDING IN THE PIGEON: THE DEPENDENCE OF EFFICIENT PERFORMANCE ON THE AVAILABILITY OF A STIMULUS FOR COLLATERAL PECKING
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |